Leadership in Sustainable Beauty
With the rise of highly customer-centric brands, the beauty industry has been expanding at an unprecedented rate. However, the environmental costs of innovative products are often overlooked due to the influx of new entrants as a result of the industry’s low barriers to entry.
We spoke with Laura Burget, co-founder of Three Ships Beauty, and Dion Hughes, co-founder of HiBAR, to discuss “How can beauty adapt to sustainability while maintaining high growth and consumer centricity?” Both are innovation leaders in the beauty industry, Three Ships Beauty, an all-natural, affordable skincare line, and HiBAR, a plastic-free, water-free hair care company.
** Throughout this article, we will use the “L” and “D” to refer to Laura and Dion, respectively.
Environmental costs: so many new products, but where do they end up?
Today’s customers have more choices than ever before, as we discussed when we delved into the unprecedented growth of the beauty industry. This is a positive gas pedal in many ways, as it creates more jobs, entrepreneurs and innovative product breakthroughs. However, the industry’s growth and its impact on the environment have not been balanced. From wasteful packaging, to complex international supply chains and microplastic pollution, the beauty industry’s environmental impact cannot be described in a single article. Here are some shocking facts.
Toxic ingredients
Most products are rarely used in their entirety before being discarded, which means their contents return to our planet through landfills and water currents
Oxybenzone in sunscreens has been shown to be toxic to coral reefs and marine life in the laboratory
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in perfumes, hairsprays and hand sanitizers cause smog and air pollution, producing the same amount of chemical vapors as petroleum in cars (although 15 times more petroleum is burned as fuel)
Notorious for the use of palm oil in over 70% of cosmetics, resulting in the deforestation of over 5% of tropical forests
Packaging and Carbon Footprint
Beauty products used worldwide generate more than 120 billion pieces of packaging each year
In addition to the packaging itself, the energy used in production and the carbon footprint of transporting raw materials and finished products also have an impact
Prior to COVID-19, over 93 % of sewer blockages and damage to marine life in the UK were caused by wipes and masks (a mixture of fabric and plastic) (similar statistics are spread across the globe, mainly in North America and Europe). The increase in personal disinfection products since COVID-19 has exacerbated the problem as wipes, napkins and chemicals are relentlessly disposed of everywhere – at least 100 tons of wipes were added to landfills in many U.S. states during COVID-19.
Carbon emissions, water pollution, endangered marine life, deforestation, smog and air pollution are just some of the under-studied but harmful effects of the booming cosmetics industry. Learn more about how cosmetics are destroying our planet here.
Our beauty products are polluting our atmosphere and oceans because, despite sustainable innovation, we are unable to address the waste problem as an industry by.
“London-based analyst firm Future Market Insights predicts that the global organic beauty market will reach $54 billion by 2027. Clean formulations, efficient recycling and non-toxic packaging have become the basic hygiene habits expected by millennial customers. But even cleaning brands with better formulas and packaging can’t solve beauty’s biggest problem – waste disposal.” – Credit: Mint
Do customers care about sustainability?